anti human mouse rat cd47 antibody Search Results



91
Elabscience Biotechnology anti human mouse rat cd47 antibody
Preparation and characterization of <t>anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP.</t> A) Hydrodynamic size and zeta potential of CM vesicles, PLGA cores (NP), PCM@NP, and anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP. Data are means ± SD ( n = 3). B) Colocalization of NP/C6 (green) with DiD‐PCM (red), and the colocalization of FITC‐antibody (green) with DiD‐PCM@NP (red), both assessed by confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) (scale bar = 5 µm). C) Transmission electron micrographs of (a) NP, (b) CM vesicle, (c) PCM@NP, (d) Anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP, and (e) multiple anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP. All scale bars = 100 nm. D) SDS‐PAGE protein analysis of NP, PCM@NP, CM vesicles, and cancer cell lysate. Samples were tested at equal protein concentrations. CD47 protein and membrane‐specific protein on the cancer cell membrane were efficiently retained on the extracted membrane vesicles and the PCM@NP, detected by western blot. E) Determination of the antibody labeled by PE loaded on the surface of anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP by flow nanoanalyzer. F) The binding affinity of the antibody to the CM vesicles by surface plasmon resonance (SPR).
Anti Human Mouse Rat Cd47 Antibody, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+human+mouse+rat+cd47+antibody/PE+Anti-Human%2FMouse%2FRat+CD47+Antibody/pmc10037698-179-25-29
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human mouse rat cd47 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Elabscience Biotechnology anti fitc-labeled cd47
Preparation and characterization of <t>anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP.</t> A) Hydrodynamic size and zeta potential of CM vesicles, PLGA cores (NP), PCM@NP, and anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP. Data are means ± SD ( n = 3). B) Colocalization of NP/C6 (green) with DiD‐PCM (red), and the colocalization of FITC‐antibody (green) with DiD‐PCM@NP (red), both assessed by confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) (scale bar = 5 µm). C) Transmission electron micrographs of (a) NP, (b) CM vesicle, (c) PCM@NP, (d) Anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP, and (e) multiple anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP. All scale bars = 100 nm. D) SDS‐PAGE protein analysis of NP, PCM@NP, CM vesicles, and cancer cell lysate. Samples were tested at equal protein concentrations. CD47 protein and membrane‐specific protein on the cancer cell membrane were efficiently retained on the extracted membrane vesicles and the PCM@NP, detected by western blot. E) Determination of the antibody labeled by PE loaded on the surface of anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP by flow nanoanalyzer. F) The binding affinity of the antibody to the CM vesicles by surface plasmon resonance (SPR).
Anti Fitc Labeled Cd47, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+human+mouse+rat+cd47+antibody/FITC+Anti-Human%2FMouse%2FRat+CD47+Antibody/pm41539566-118-11-27
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti fitc-labeled cd47 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

N/A
CD47, also known as Integrin-Associated Protein (IAP), is a membrane protein of about 50 kD with an IgV-like extracelluluar domain, a five membrane-spanning segment and a short terminal cytoplasmic region. It is widely expressed on
  Buy from Supplier





N/A
CD47, also known as Integrin-Associated Protein (IAP), is a membrane protein of about 50 kD with an IgV-like extracelluluar domain, a five membrane-spanning segment and a short terminal cytoplasmic region. It is widely expressed on
  Buy from Supplier



N/A
CD47, also known as Integrin-Associated Protein (IAP), is a membrane protein of about 50 kD with an IgV-like extracelluluar domain, a five membrane-spanning segment and a short terminal cytoplasmic region. It is widely expressed on
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Preparation and characterization of anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP. A) Hydrodynamic size and zeta potential of CM vesicles, PLGA cores (NP), PCM@NP, and anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP. Data are means ± SD ( n = 3). B) Colocalization of NP/C6 (green) with DiD‐PCM (red), and the colocalization of FITC‐antibody (green) with DiD‐PCM@NP (red), both assessed by confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) (scale bar = 5 µm). C) Transmission electron micrographs of (a) NP, (b) CM vesicle, (c) PCM@NP, (d) Anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP, and (e) multiple anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP. All scale bars = 100 nm. D) SDS‐PAGE protein analysis of NP, PCM@NP, CM vesicles, and cancer cell lysate. Samples were tested at equal protein concentrations. CD47 protein and membrane‐specific protein on the cancer cell membrane were efficiently retained on the extracted membrane vesicles and the PCM@NP, detected by western blot. E) Determination of the antibody labeled by PE loaded on the surface of anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP by flow nanoanalyzer. F) The binding affinity of the antibody to the CM vesicles by surface plasmon resonance (SPR).

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: Overcoming the On‐Target Toxicity in Antibody‐Mediated Therapies via an Indirect Active Targeting Strategy

doi: 10.1002/advs.202206912

Figure Lengend Snippet: Preparation and characterization of anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP. A) Hydrodynamic size and zeta potential of CM vesicles, PLGA cores (NP), PCM@NP, and anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP. Data are means ± SD ( n = 3). B) Colocalization of NP/C6 (green) with DiD‐PCM (red), and the colocalization of FITC‐antibody (green) with DiD‐PCM@NP (red), both assessed by confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) (scale bar = 5 µm). C) Transmission electron micrographs of (a) NP, (b) CM vesicle, (c) PCM@NP, (d) Anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP, and (e) multiple anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP. All scale bars = 100 nm. D) SDS‐PAGE protein analysis of NP, PCM@NP, CM vesicles, and cancer cell lysate. Samples were tested at equal protein concentrations. CD47 protein and membrane‐specific protein on the cancer cell membrane were efficiently retained on the extracted membrane vesicles and the PCM@NP, detected by western blot. E) Determination of the antibody labeled by PE loaded on the surface of anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP by flow nanoanalyzer. F) The binding affinity of the antibody to the CM vesicles by surface plasmon resonance (SPR).

Article Snippet: The cells were diluted at 1× 10 6 cells per mL in a culture medium and incubated with 1.0 mg mL −1 of a PE anti‐human/mouse/rat CD47 antibody (E‐AB‐F1016D, Elabscience) or anti‐Neu/ErbB2/HER2 Antibody (SC‐7301, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and CoraLite488‐conjugated Affinipure coat anti‐mouse IgG(H+L) (SA00013‐1, Proteintech) for 30 min at 4 °C.

Techniques: Zeta Potential Analyzer, Laser-Scanning Microscopy, Transmission Assay, SDS Page, Membrane, Western Blot, Labeling, Binding Assay, SPR Assay

Anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP effectively distinguished target cells from CD47‐expressing nontarget cells in vitro through indirect active targeting. A) Anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP avoided the blocking of CD47 on RBC and subsequent phagocytosis thus circumvented the on‐target toxicity of free anti‐CD47 towards RBC through the INTACT strategy. Scale bar = 50 µm. B,C) PCM@NP and anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP efficiently escaped the capture by B) macrophages with enhanced and parallel cellular uptake by C) target 4T1 cells, measured by flow cytometry. The antibody selectively dissociated from the carrier PCM@NP at the presence of 4T1 cells with high expression of D) CD47 in contrast to E) CD47 −/− 4T1 cells, shown by colocalization images and distribution map of PE‐antibody (red) and PCM@NP/C6 (green). Scale bar = 20 µm (multi‐cell images), 2 µm (single‐cell images). F) The schematic diagram of the microfluidic device. The tumor cells were cultured in the cavity of the microfluidic chip till adherence, and then exposed to flowing anti‐CD47 or anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP, and fluorescent images were captured at predetermined time points. G) Free anti‐CD47 sufficiently bound to the surface of 4T1 cells with high expression of CD47 (a). The antibody dissociated from PCM@NP at the presence of 4T1 cells (b), in contrast with CD47 −/− 4T1 group (c) (antibody labeled with FITC, green. PCM@NP labeled with DiD, red). Scale bar = 10 µm. Original movies are shown in Movie S1 (Supporting Information) (a), Movie S2 (Supporting Information) (b), and Movie S3 (Supporting Information) (c), respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 3). (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; NS represents non‐significance).

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: Overcoming the On‐Target Toxicity in Antibody‐Mediated Therapies via an Indirect Active Targeting Strategy

doi: 10.1002/advs.202206912

Figure Lengend Snippet: Anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP effectively distinguished target cells from CD47‐expressing nontarget cells in vitro through indirect active targeting. A) Anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP avoided the blocking of CD47 on RBC and subsequent phagocytosis thus circumvented the on‐target toxicity of free anti‐CD47 towards RBC through the INTACT strategy. Scale bar = 50 µm. B,C) PCM@NP and anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP efficiently escaped the capture by B) macrophages with enhanced and parallel cellular uptake by C) target 4T1 cells, measured by flow cytometry. The antibody selectively dissociated from the carrier PCM@NP at the presence of 4T1 cells with high expression of D) CD47 in contrast to E) CD47 −/− 4T1 cells, shown by colocalization images and distribution map of PE‐antibody (red) and PCM@NP/C6 (green). Scale bar = 20 µm (multi‐cell images), 2 µm (single‐cell images). F) The schematic diagram of the microfluidic device. The tumor cells were cultured in the cavity of the microfluidic chip till adherence, and then exposed to flowing anti‐CD47 or anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP, and fluorescent images were captured at predetermined time points. G) Free anti‐CD47 sufficiently bound to the surface of 4T1 cells with high expression of CD47 (a). The antibody dissociated from PCM@NP at the presence of 4T1 cells (b), in contrast with CD47 −/− 4T1 group (c) (antibody labeled with FITC, green. PCM@NP labeled with DiD, red). Scale bar = 10 µm. Original movies are shown in Movie S1 (Supporting Information) (a), Movie S2 (Supporting Information) (b), and Movie S3 (Supporting Information) (c), respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 3). (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; NS represents non‐significance).

Article Snippet: The cells were diluted at 1× 10 6 cells per mL in a culture medium and incubated with 1.0 mg mL −1 of a PE anti‐human/mouse/rat CD47 antibody (E‐AB‐F1016D, Elabscience) or anti‐Neu/ErbB2/HER2 Antibody (SC‐7301, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and CoraLite488‐conjugated Affinipure coat anti‐mouse IgG(H+L) (SA00013‐1, Proteintech) for 30 min at 4 °C.

Techniques: Expressing, In Vitro, Blocking Assay, Flow Cytometry, Cell Culture, Labeling

Evaluation of the biological functions of anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP in vivo. A) In vivo and ex vivo targeting ability of anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP and anti‐CD47 in tumor‐bearing mice models determined by live imaging. B) The semiquantitative analysis of the ratio of fluorescence intensity (tumor/liver) of ex vivo imaging. C) In vivo biodistribution of coumarin 6 (C6)‐labeled formulations in tumor‐bearing mice models at (a) 2 h, (b) 4 h, (c) 8 h, and (d) 12 h after i.v. injection of NP/C6, PCM@NP/C6 and anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP/C6. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 3) (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; NS represents non‐significance).

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: Overcoming the On‐Target Toxicity in Antibody‐Mediated Therapies via an Indirect Active Targeting Strategy

doi: 10.1002/advs.202206912

Figure Lengend Snippet: Evaluation of the biological functions of anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP in vivo. A) In vivo and ex vivo targeting ability of anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP and anti‐CD47 in tumor‐bearing mice models determined by live imaging. B) The semiquantitative analysis of the ratio of fluorescence intensity (tumor/liver) of ex vivo imaging. C) In vivo biodistribution of coumarin 6 (C6)‐labeled formulations in tumor‐bearing mice models at (a) 2 h, (b) 4 h, (c) 8 h, and (d) 12 h after i.v. injection of NP/C6, PCM@NP/C6 and anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP/C6. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 3) (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; NS represents non‐significance).

Article Snippet: The cells were diluted at 1× 10 6 cells per mL in a culture medium and incubated with 1.0 mg mL −1 of a PE anti‐human/mouse/rat CD47 antibody (E‐AB‐F1016D, Elabscience) or anti‐Neu/ErbB2/HER2 Antibody (SC‐7301, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and CoraLite488‐conjugated Affinipure coat anti‐mouse IgG(H+L) (SA00013‐1, Proteintech) for 30 min at 4 °C.

Techniques: In Vivo, Ex Vivo, Imaging, Fluorescence, Labeling, Injection

Antitumor efficacy of anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP and mechanistic investigation by CyTOF analysis. A) Representative images and phagocytic index of C57BL/6 bone marrow‐derived macrophages (BMDM) phagocytosing tumor cells following treatment with PCM@NP, anti‐CD47, and anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP. Scale bar = 50 µm. B) Timeline of the anti‐tumor efficacy study on tumor‐bearing mice (red arrows indicate intravenous administrations), and average tumor growth curves and picture of tumor tissues after the treatment. C) Individual tumor growth curves in each group. D) viSNE plot of intratumoral cells in tumor tissues after treatment with saline, PCM@NP, anti‐CD47, anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP and all groups merged. E) Heat map of the surface molecule and functional molecule expression of different subsets of immune cells in tumor tissues from all groups merged. F) tSNE visualization of all samples with the expression of CD4 and CD8a respectively. G) Percentage of cells in each cluster after treatment from each group. Data represented as mean ± SD ( n = 6). (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; NS represents nonsignificance).

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: Overcoming the On‐Target Toxicity in Antibody‐Mediated Therapies via an Indirect Active Targeting Strategy

doi: 10.1002/advs.202206912

Figure Lengend Snippet: Antitumor efficacy of anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP and mechanistic investigation by CyTOF analysis. A) Representative images and phagocytic index of C57BL/6 bone marrow‐derived macrophages (BMDM) phagocytosing tumor cells following treatment with PCM@NP, anti‐CD47, and anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP. Scale bar = 50 µm. B) Timeline of the anti‐tumor efficacy study on tumor‐bearing mice (red arrows indicate intravenous administrations), and average tumor growth curves and picture of tumor tissues after the treatment. C) Individual tumor growth curves in each group. D) viSNE plot of intratumoral cells in tumor tissues after treatment with saline, PCM@NP, anti‐CD47, anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP and all groups merged. E) Heat map of the surface molecule and functional molecule expression of different subsets of immune cells in tumor tissues from all groups merged. F) tSNE visualization of all samples with the expression of CD4 and CD8a respectively. G) Percentage of cells in each cluster after treatment from each group. Data represented as mean ± SD ( n = 6). (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; NS represents nonsignificance).

Article Snippet: The cells were diluted at 1× 10 6 cells per mL in a culture medium and incubated with 1.0 mg mL −1 of a PE anti‐human/mouse/rat CD47 antibody (E‐AB‐F1016D, Elabscience) or anti‐Neu/ErbB2/HER2 Antibody (SC‐7301, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and CoraLite488‐conjugated Affinipure coat anti‐mouse IgG(H+L) (SA00013‐1, Proteintech) for 30 min at 4 °C.

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Saline, Functional Assay, Expressing

The INTACT strategy efficiently delivers antibodies to tumors with reduced in vivo toxicity. A) Anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP exhibited no significant influence on red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), hematocrit (HCT), and platelet (PLT). Data represented as mean ± SD ( n = 3). B–D) Anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP relieved the occurrence of fungal infection during antitumor treatment. B) Experimental timeline and treatments in tumor‐bearing mice (arrows indicate intravenous administrations). At day 14, mice were infected with C. albicans via tail vein injection. C) Colony‐forming units (CFU) on day 7 in the kidneys of infected mouse models ( n = 6). D) The survival rates of infected mice with different treatments ( n = 12). Data represented as mean ± SD. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; NS represents non‐significance).

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: Overcoming the On‐Target Toxicity in Antibody‐Mediated Therapies via an Indirect Active Targeting Strategy

doi: 10.1002/advs.202206912

Figure Lengend Snippet: The INTACT strategy efficiently delivers antibodies to tumors with reduced in vivo toxicity. A) Anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP exhibited no significant influence on red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), hematocrit (HCT), and platelet (PLT). Data represented as mean ± SD ( n = 3). B–D) Anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP relieved the occurrence of fungal infection during antitumor treatment. B) Experimental timeline and treatments in tumor‐bearing mice (arrows indicate intravenous administrations). At day 14, mice were infected with C. albicans via tail vein injection. C) Colony‐forming units (CFU) on day 7 in the kidneys of infected mouse models ( n = 6). D) The survival rates of infected mice with different treatments ( n = 12). Data represented as mean ± SD. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; NS represents non‐significance).

Article Snippet: The cells were diluted at 1× 10 6 cells per mL in a culture medium and incubated with 1.0 mg mL −1 of a PE anti‐human/mouse/rat CD47 antibody (E‐AB‐F1016D, Elabscience) or anti‐Neu/ErbB2/HER2 Antibody (SC‐7301, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and CoraLite488‐conjugated Affinipure coat anti‐mouse IgG(H+L) (SA00013‐1, Proteintech) for 30 min at 4 °C.

Techniques: In Vivo, Infection, Injection

The INTACT strategy is adaptive to multiple antibody‐based systems. A) Relative tumor volume growth with anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP/PTX treatment ( n = 6). B–G) The INTACT therapy refined the targeting precision of ADC. B) The diagram of ADC construction: Anti‐CD47 was modified with streptavidin and conjugated with DM1 via the crosslinker BMCC‐biotin. C) The conjugation of ADC was confirmed with SDS‐PAGE. D) Experimental timeline for the anti‐tumor efficacy study and hematology assessments of ADC‐PCM@NP (red arrows indicate intravenous administrations). E) Average tumor growth curves, and picture of the tumor tissues after the treatment ( n = 6). F) Individual tumor growth curves in each group ( n = 6). G) Hematology assessments of red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), hematocrit (HCT), and platelet (PLT) ( n = 3). Data represented as mean ± SD. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; NS represents non‐significance).

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: Overcoming the On‐Target Toxicity in Antibody‐Mediated Therapies via an Indirect Active Targeting Strategy

doi: 10.1002/advs.202206912

Figure Lengend Snippet: The INTACT strategy is adaptive to multiple antibody‐based systems. A) Relative tumor volume growth with anti‐CD47‐PCM@NP/PTX treatment ( n = 6). B–G) The INTACT therapy refined the targeting precision of ADC. B) The diagram of ADC construction: Anti‐CD47 was modified with streptavidin and conjugated with DM1 via the crosslinker BMCC‐biotin. C) The conjugation of ADC was confirmed with SDS‐PAGE. D) Experimental timeline for the anti‐tumor efficacy study and hematology assessments of ADC‐PCM@NP (red arrows indicate intravenous administrations). E) Average tumor growth curves, and picture of the tumor tissues after the treatment ( n = 6). F) Individual tumor growth curves in each group ( n = 6). G) Hematology assessments of red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), hematocrit (HCT), and platelet (PLT) ( n = 3). Data represented as mean ± SD. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; NS represents non‐significance).

Article Snippet: The cells were diluted at 1× 10 6 cells per mL in a culture medium and incubated with 1.0 mg mL −1 of a PE anti‐human/mouse/rat CD47 antibody (E‐AB‐F1016D, Elabscience) or anti‐Neu/ErbB2/HER2 Antibody (SC‐7301, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and CoraLite488‐conjugated Affinipure coat anti‐mouse IgG(H+L) (SA00013‐1, Proteintech) for 30 min at 4 °C.

Techniques: Modification, Conjugation Assay, SDS Page